Multi-national companies devote much time and many resources to analyzing potential market areas. This is especially true if they plan to open a subsidiary in another country. They may give several years to determining the precise nation and city in which to build. Once the city is determined, they often contract such specialists as sociologists, anthropologists and economists, to research in depth its climate, people, institutions, political and financial stability, the potential market for their product or service, the availability of possible employees, health conditions and other factors of vital importance to their success in that location.
As a general rule, technical preparation for approaching and strategizing great cities is almost nil, often devoid of specific understanding of how cities function and how one should analyze them. Urban workers, therefore, face the dilemma of planning strategies for a challenge that they only partially visualize. As a result, they develop a strategy without the input necessary to make it precisely fit that particular city.
Urban research can create an understanding of the city in general, and in the specifics of its structure, problems, opportunities, social classes and ethnic groups.
Comprehensive urban research can point the researcher to the gaps that exist in evangelistic outreach in the city. Furnished with this data, with measurements of receptivity and church-planting methods, the evangelist or team can strategize means for filling these gaps. Research can help develop good strategies for the entire city, rather than for piecemeal portions of it. Urban research is not an end in itself, but rather a tool to sharpen both understanding and evangelistic focus.
Sociological vs. Anthropological Approaches. One fundamental issue in urban research is the tension that exists between sociological and anthropological approaches to urban research. Hiebert (981.1) lists the differences between them as follows:
Sociology stresses Anthropology stresses - group and society - culture and society - social behaviorism - behavior and cognition - macro approaches - micro approaches - western societies - nonwestern societies - quantitative approaches - qualitative approaches - use of questionnaires - participant observation - use of lab settings, - real-life settings in context as well as real life - detached observation - participant observationChurch Growth Methodology. Before investigating the merits of these two methods and the elements from each that are useable in given situations, one must look briefly at the methodology for urban research advanced by church growth specialists:
Church growth methodology stresses
One of the primary reasons that we have been successful here is that we have learned to ask the right questions...If you do not ask right questions, you cannot get right answers (in Chaney 1985:17).Survey information of a general nature, obtainable from the Census Bureau and other city agencies, should have available the following data: (1) Population by age categories; (2) Life expectancy figures; (3) Professions and their percentages within the population; (4) Percentage of population at different income levels; (5) Types of housing and their percentage within the whole; (6) Religious affiliations, by number and percentage; (7) Churches, their locations and growth figures; (8) Educational levels, schools and their populations; (9) Racial, cultural, national and language figures; (10) Percentage of families owning cars, telephones, refrigerators, inside plumbing and other conveniences; (11) Business and industry; (12) Crime, health, welfare and mortality figures.
All cities have an abundance of materials for the researcher, but they must be interpreted properly. One area that always needs interpretation is that of population. Do the figures at hand include only the mother city or do they include the satellite towns and communities around the central city, the greater or metropolitan region? How old are these statistics? What is the margin of error in them? Based on urban experience in Brazil, it can be assumed that the margin of error for population figures is about ten percent, generally on the low side. Many inhabitants, especially in slum areas, are missed in census-taking.
Both of these approaches to urban research have their strengths and
weaknesses. Community or city-wide investigation places the observer in
the role of participant in a broad cultural setting. It appears to be a
sound way in which to study an entire city, because it is supposedly a
total immersion into the society being studied, in order to understand
every detail of that city and its relationship to the culture. However,
world-class cities are hard to thoroughly analyze because of their size and
growth rate, as well as the complexity of their institutions and social
groupings. Basham rightly states that the "very scale of a city, with its
diverse peoples and life-ways, almost precludes total comprehension..."
(1978:28).
It is the writer's opinion that the missionary researcher must look
first at the city in its totality and then certain smaller elements of it
in detail. As in the case of the famous blind men of Hindustan, each
examining one feature of an elephant, the researcher may get a distorted
view of the city from investigating only a segment of it. The broad view
is necessary for perspective, in order to avoid spending years in some
portion of the city and losing sight of the metropolis as a whole. This is
what occurs, time and time again in large metropolitan centers. In
concentrating on one community (or one level of the society), one can
overlook the nature of the "elephant as a whole".
Cross-cultural Research. If the city is to be
properly researched, the investigator must take into account the complex
ethnic mix within it. His or her aim should be to study all of this
richness of cultural diversity. No matter how long the researcher lives in
a host city as a participant-observer, he or she will miss many of the
subtleties of what is really happening in a cross-cultural communication
situation. Information may be given that is misleading, not properly
understood or colored by the researcher's own cultural and language
bias.
Community and Ethnographic Studies. Community
studies can be valuable for the religious worker because it provides a
close look at the workings of a limited area that could be served by a
single church; at the interrelationships in that area, its needs, goals and
mentality in general. Ethnographic studies are even more limited in scope
than community studies, for they focus on a specific individual, family or
small group within a community. With verifiable biographical material in
hand, furnished by reliable informants, the researcher can have a fair
certainty as to the thought processes and behavior of the larger society
represented by the ethnographic study.
All of these and other related urban research tools will enable urban
evangelists and church planters to strategize the entire city for eventual
spiritual conquest. These tools will enable Christian workers to better
reach great, exploding megacities for Christ. This is why Christians are
there--to "see the good of the city" (Jer. 29:7).
1985 Anthropological Insights for Missionaries. Grand
Rapids: Baker Book House.
Church Growth Research
Church growth research utilizes many of the above sociological and
anthropological tools, but applies them to a specific goal--that of
locating appropriate sectors of society and geographical locations for
planting and developing growing churches. Church growth research is
concerned with analyzing ethnic and social groups, searching among them for
factors that lead to receptivity to the Gospel. These include recent
calamities or crises of a city-wide, community, family or personal nature,
wars and periods of reconstruction, migration, decline of a culture,
tradition or religion, a period of rapid technological and industrial
change, social mobility, prior accessibility to the Word of God, changes in
government or city leadership, personal influences, and above all, the
intervention of the Holy Spirit in the affairs of the city and the plans of
church workers attempting to reach it.CONCLUSION
In order to strategize and eventually impact a major city, it is
essential to research it thoroughly. This research involves the use of
various tools provided by sociology, anthropology and church growth
methodology. Sociology supplies survey statistics and techniques.
Anthropology supplies holistic approaches to the people of a city, as well
as micro approaches, such as community studies and ethnographs. Church
growth methodology supplies vision for the city as a whole and the ability
to search out homogeneous units, family webs, social networks and factors
of receptivity. It also provides the tools for feasibility studies of
appropriate areas of the city for church planting.SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR FURTHER READING
1986 World-Class Cities and World Evangelization.
Birmingham, AL: New Hope.
Basham, Richard
1978 Urban Anthropology: The Cross-Cultural Study of Complex
Societies. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Chaney, Charles L.
1985 Church-Planting at the End of the Twentieth Century.
Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.
Eames, Edwin, and Judith Granich Goode
1977 Anthropology of the City. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Fox, Richard G.
1977 Urban Anthropology: Cities in Their Cultural Settings.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hannerz, Ulf
1980 Exploring the City: Inquiries Toward an Urban
Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hiebert, Paul G.
1976 Cultural Anthropology. Philadelphia: J. B.
Lippencott.
Lewis, Oscar
1963 The Children of Sanchez. New York: Vintage Books.
Liebow, Elliot
1967 Talley's Corner. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Maust, John
1984 Cities of Change. Coral Gables, FL: Latin American
Mission.
Monsma, Timothy
1979 An Urban Strategy for Africa. Pasadena, CA: William
Carey.
Palen, J. John
1981 The Urban World. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Shipp, Glover
1986 Research As A Tool for Urban Evangelism in Developing
Countries. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Mirrored by permission of ACU Missions Personnel
Direct questions and comments to Ed Mathews,
Page maintained by